Please upgrade your Flash Player to the latest version Click here to download
Troubled Marriages
THE SEVEN MOST POWERFUL WORDS IN MARRIAGE ARE,
" I AM SORRY, WILL YOU FORGIVE ME?"

Some Quotes on Forgiveness

Forgiveness is not an elective in the curriculum of life. It is a required course, and the exams are always tough to pass. - Charles Swindoll

"Eating Crow" is never pleasant---no matter how much mustard and ketchup you put on it. But usually the sooner you eat it the less unpleasant it is to the taste! - Nido Quebein

Forgiveness is the oil of relationships. - Josh McDowell

Love lets the past die. It moves people to a new beginning without settling the past. Love prefers to tuck the loose ends of past rights and wrongs in the bosom of forgiveness---and pushes us into a new start. - Lewis B. Smedes

Resentment forces us to "re-feel" our wounds, while forgiveness heals the wounds. - Unknown

Of the seven deadly sins, anger is possibly the most fun. To lick your wounds, to smack your lips over grievances long past, to savor to the last toothsome morsel both the pain you are given and the pain you are giving back. In many ways it is a feast fit for a king. The chief drawback is that what you are wolfing down is yourself. The skeleton at the feast is you. - Frederick Buechner

Resentment is like taking poison and waiting for the other person to die. - Malachy McCourt

Books

Marriage Crossroads
Why Divorce is Often Not the Best Option
(Rationale, Resources and References)
Brent A. Barlow, PhD

Marriage Crossroads

Not long ago I was talking to a friend I had known for some time. During our conversation she asked if I could help in some way with a difficult situation that had arisen in her family. Her daughter and son-in-law of several years were contemplating a divorce. They had two children. She said the young couple wasn't sure at the time, however, if they should divorce or stay together. They were looking at both options and were, therefore, at the crossroads of marriage. I told my friend that evening I would send her some materials and references that might assist her daughter and son-in-law with this critical decision. Since that time, I have had numerous similar requests from married couples, their friends or family members.

During the past few years, I have also had similar requests for information from several young adults. Many of them are seriously thinking about getting married at the same time their parents are contemplating divorce. The future brides and grooms have asked for information to send their parents to help them reassess their marital situation.

Therapist and author Michele Weiner Davis has noted:

The decision to divorce or remain together to work things out is one of the most important decisions you will ever make. It is crucial for those considering divorce to anticipate what lies ahead in order to make informed decisions. Too often the fallout from divorce is far more devastating than many people realize when contemplating the move. (Divorce Busting. p. 25; See References for complete citations.)

It was for this reason "Marriage Crossroads: Why Divorce Is Often Not the Best Option" was written. I want to assist married couples to make "informed decisions" by providing pertinent and recent information. While it is intended primarily for couples with troubled marriages, family members and friends may also find this information useful.

I believe it is in the best interests of many married couples (and their children) to stay married, where possible, and work on improving their relationship. The reasons for this belief are included in this pamphlet.

LARGE NUMBERS AT THE CROSSROADS

There are apparently a large number of married couples in the United Sates who approach the

crossroads. At the present time approximately 40-50 percent of couples in first marriages arrive at this point and eventually choose the path of divorce. The divorce rate for couples in second marriages is between 50-60 percent. Many other couples apparently reach the crossroads but decide, for various reasons, to stay married. One report, a Gallup Poll in the United States , found that 40 percent of married individuals had considered leaving their partners, and 20 percent said they were dissatisfied with their marriage about half the time. (Olson and Defrain, p. 6) Stated another way, nearly half the couples in the United States currently divorce, and another 20 percent seriously considered it.

Apparently, many newlyweds reach the crossroads of marriage during the first or second year of marriage:

Even newlyweds face serious problems during the first year of marriage. A study of several hundred newlywed couples found that 63 percent had serious problems related to their finances, 51 percent had serious doubts about their marriage lasting, 49 percent had significant marital problems, 45 percent were not satisfied with their sexual relationship, 41 percent found marriage harder than they had expected, and 35 percent stated their partner was often critical of them. (Ibid. p. 6)

A large number of newlyweds at the crossroads evidently choose to terminate their marriage since divorce most often occurs during the second and third years of marriage. Half of all first marriages that end in divorce . . . end within the first seven years. (Ibid., p. 517)

After several years of marriage another large group of married couples in the U.S. evidently arrive at the crossroads since there is a 16 percent increase in the divorce rate after thirty years of marriage. (Arp and Arp, p. 31) This may be due to "the float of isolation" that begins early in many marriages and often expands as the marriage continues. (Rainey, p. 7)

SOME DIVORCES ARE WARRANTED

While advocating marriage, we must be sensitive to those who have chosen to terminate their marriage. There are legitimate reasons or grounds for divorce. An estimated 30 percent of the divorces in the U.S. involve marital relationships with a high degree of conflict. (Amato and Booth, p. 220) Sometimes violence, physical and mental abuse and/or threat of life to spouse and children are also present in these highly conflicted relationships. As such, divorce in these situations is most often in the best interest of those involved.

In her book, The Case Against Divorce, Diane Medved also has a chapter titled "Exceptional Situations: When You Should Divorce." Chronic addiction or substance abuse, psychosis or extreme mental illness, and physical or mental abuse are among those situations or conditions listed. Medved also gives some additional insights of when it's time to say goodbye. (Chapter 8, pp. 103-130)

Couples who divorce, particularly for the reasons noted, often need the help and support of family, friends, neighbors, religious leaders and others in their respective communities. This is particularly so where children are involved. The adjustment to divorce is often difficult and apparently lasts for a considerable period of time. Legal assistance is needed, and sometimes couples may need counseling or therapy before, during and after the separation for themselves and their children, if they have them. Competent counselors and therapists are available to assist in this transition. Many couples today are also utilizing the services of divorce mediation

organizations that can often help lessen the trauma of divorce both before and after it occurs.

I offer my sincere hope for the future for husbands and wives who have chosen to divorce. But I also offer my encouragement to the numerous married couples at the crossroads to try stay together, where possible, and work through their differences and difficulties.

POINTS TO PONDER

If you are married and trying to decide whether to divorce or stay married, carefully consider the following sixteen items before you make your "informed decision":

  1. THE OTHER 70 PERCENT OF DIVORCES

When we note that 30 percent of divorces involve couples in highly conflicted marriages, a question arises about the other 70 percent: Should they divorce or stay married? There are, perhaps, legitimate reasons for separating in about 10 percent of these relationships as well.

One study reported that the major reasons marriages fail are (in rank order) (1) infidelity, (2) no longer in love, (3) emotional problems, (4) financial problems, (5) sexual problems, (6) problems with in-laws, (7) neglect of children, (8) physical abuse, (9) alcohol, (10) job conflicts (11) communication problems, and (12) married too young. (Olson and DeFrain, p. 522)

It is interesting to note that physical abuse was ranked as number eight in reasons for divorce, and "no longer in love" ranked as number two. Many marriages seem to end from burn-out rather than blow-out. A significant number of these couples could work through their problems, revive their love, and stay married if they desired and worked at it. Only the husband and wife involved in a particular marriage, however, can make the decision whether to stay married or divorce since they are the ones who must ultimately abide by the consequences of the decision.

It is becoming increasingly evident, however, to those who study marriage trends in the United States , that an estimated 50 to 60 percent of divorces could, and perhaps should, be avoided in the best interests of those involved. Consider the following statements:

The divorce revolution-the steady displacement of a marriage culture by a culture of divorce and unwed parenthood-has failed. It has created terrible hardships for children, incurred insupportable social costs, and failed to deliver on its promise of greater adult happiness. The time has come to shift the focus of national attention from divorce to marriage and to rebuild a family culture based on enduring marital relationships. ("Marriage In America : A Report To The Nation," 1995, pp. 4-5)

After acknowledging the necessity for some divorces, therapist Diane Medved wrote the rest of her book stating her case against divorce, thus the title of her book. At the beginning she makes the following observation and suggestion:

It is finally time to renounce-openly and clearly-the self-serving

platitudes about independence and fulfillment and look at the reality of divorce. We act too frequently as if every infirm marriage deserves to die, based simply upon the emotional report of one distressed partner. Rather than viewing a separation first with alarm, we're full of sympathy for a divorcing friend, and we offer understanding of the temporary insanity involved in severing old ties. Still influenced by the "do your own thing" era we don't act constructively. We don't take a husband (or wife) by the shoulders and shake him. We don't shout in his ear that he might be making a disastrous mistake. Even if we care immensely about him, we feel it's too intrusively "judgmental" to do more than step back and say, "Okay if that's what you want," and close our eyes to the consequences. My research suggests that this is more cruelty than friendship. (p. 8)

Medved also notes:

If you hear someone for whom you have any feeling at all hinting at separation, instead of tacitly endorsing the move, instantly protest. Nearly every marriage has something worth preserving, something that can be restored. Revitalizing a relationship brings triumph and ongoing reward. Avoiding divorce spares those concerned from the greatest trauma of their lives. (p. 11; italics added)

  1. WHAT ARE THE BENEFITS OF A STABLE MARRIAGE?

Several researchers and authors have reported the importance of a stable marriage for adults. In his book Why Marriage Matters, Glenn T. Stanton has written:

As the researchers have gone to press with their work and produced an enormous literature, one of the most consistent findings is that men and women do markedly better in all measures of specific and general well-being when they are married, compared to any of their unmarried counterparts. Married couples are healthier-physically and mentally-and they live longer, enjoy a more fulfilled life, and take better care of themselves (and each other). This has been shown consistently over decades, but it is rarely mentioned in the popular debate on the family. One of social science's best-kept secrets is that marriage is much more than a legal agreement between two people. Marriage truly makes a difference in the lives of men and women. (p. 73)

Three other authors, David Larson, James P. Swyers and Susan S. Larson, also noted the following in their book, The Costly Consequences of Divorce:

What would you say if someone told you that a particular social bond could add years to your life and ensure your children a better education and economic livelihood? Furthermore, what would you say if you also found out that breaking this social bond was only slightly less harmful to your health than smoking a pack or more of cigarettes per day and could significantly increase your risk of depression, alcohol abuse, and committing suicide? And what would you say if you found out that this social bond that was potentially so

beneficial to you and your children's health and personal well-being was marriage? Truly, the research is striking. For decades, studies have shown that the married live longer and have a lower risk of a variety of physical and psychological illness than the unmarried. (p.1)

In his article "Marital Status and Personal Well-Being," Robert H. Coombs from the UCLA School of Medicine similarly noted:

The therapeutic benefits of marriage remain relatively unrecognized by most youths, the media, and some helping professionals who, preoccupied with accelerating divorce rates and variant family forms, question the value of marriage in contemporary society. Media messages have minimized marriage, implying it is an outdated institution, an "uncool" survivor of a simpler society. Family educators can serve an important function by teaching the therapeutic benefits of marriage and that it is in each person's own best interest to establish and maintain a durable relationship with an emotionally supportive spouse. The lack of this resource is a mental health deficit. (pp. 100-101)

  1. WHAT CAN BE THE IMPACT OF DIVORCE ON CHILDREN?

It is obvious that a large number of children of divorced parents survive the experience and later become capable and stable adults. But it is also becoming increasingly evident that many children of divorce are at risk for developing detrimental behaviors, personality disorders and disruptive lifestyles. Some of the variables in adjustment of children to parental divorce are (1) age of child at divorce, (2) amount of conflict in the marriage, (3) access to both parents after the divorce, (4) adjustment to a step-parent, if there is one and (5) access to other nurturing adults during the childhood years. What does the research say about many children of divorced parents? David B. Larson, James P. Swyers and Susan S. Larson have noted:

Coming from a disrupted family does not necessarily doom a child to later chronic unhappiness or academic or personal failure. Indeed, many resilient children and young people from disrupted families not only finish high school, but go on to college and graduate school and have successful careers, marriages and families. Unfortunately, the preponderance of evidence clearly shows that when compared to their peers from intact families, children, adolescents, and young adults from disrupted families are disproportionately represented among individuals with academic, behavioral and interpersonal problems. (p.136)

In the executive summary of the forty-nine-page report released June 5, 2000, titled "The Effects of Divorce on America ," authors Patrick F. Fagan and Robert Rector of the Heritage Foundation observed the following: [If you have access to the Internet go to the web site www.smartmarriages.com. Click on "marriage reports" to review the entire article.]

Each year, over 1 million American children suffer the divorce of their parents; moreover, half of the children born this year to parents

who are married will see their parents divorce before they turn 18. Mounting evidence in social science journals demonstrates that the devastating physical, emotional, and financial effects that divorce is having on these children will last well into adulthood and affect future generations. Among these broad and damaging effects are the following:

    • Children whose parents have divorced are increasingly the victims of abuse. They exhibit more health, behavioral, and emotional problems, are involved more frequently in crime and drug abuse, and have higher rates of suicide.
    • Children of divorced parents perform more poorly in reading, spelling, and math. They are also more likely to repeat a grade and to have a higher drop-out rates and lower rates of college graduation.
    • Families with children that were not poor before the divorce see their income drop as much as 50 percent. Almost 50 percent of the parents with children that are going through a divorce move into poverty after the divorce.
    • Religious worship, which has been linked to better health, longer marriages, and better family life drops after the parents divorce.
    • The divorce of parents, even if it is amicable, tears apart the fundamental unit of American society. Today, according to the Federal Reserve Board's 1995 Survey of Consumer Finance, only 42 percent of children aged 14-18 live in a "first marriage" family-an intact two-parent family. It should be no surprise to find that divorce is having such effects on society."

Recent research indicates that the majority of children of divorced parents do not manifest the identified problems that can be outwardly noticed or measured. But the absence of an observable behavior disorder does not mean an absence of emotional distress. A significant number of children of divorce apparently do experience a variety of emotional problems that often go undetected until late adolescence or early and even later adulthood. One of the most prevalent sources of distress reported was the children's distant relationship or infrequent contact with their fathers. Many children blamed their fathers for the divorce, and some were still angry with their fathers later in their adult lives. One-third of the children studied doubted their fathers even loved them. (Laumann-Billings and Emery, pp. 671-687)

Judith Wallerstein and colleagues also explore two major myths about divorce in their recent book, The Unexpected Legacy of Divorce, A Twenty-Five Year Landmark Study:

Two faulty beliefs provide the foundation for our current attitudes towards divorce. The first holds that if the parents are happier the children will be happier, too. Children are not considered separately from their parents; their needs, and even their thoughts are subsumed under the adult agenda. Indeed, many adults who are trapped in very unhappy marriages would be surprised to learn that their children are relatively content. They don't care if mom and dad sleep in different beds as long as the family is together.

A second myth is based on the premise that divorce is a temporary crisis that exerts its more harmful effects on parents and children at the time of the breakup. . . The belief that the crisis is temporary

underlies the notion that if acceptable legal arrangements for custody, visits, and child support are made at the time of the divorce and parents are provided with a few lectures, the child will soon be fine. It is a view we have fervently embraced and continue to hold. But it's misguided. (pp. xxiii-xxiv)

In their recent book, The Case For Marriage, Linda J. Waite And Maggie Gallagher make this summary observation:

Less than a third of divorces are ending angry high-conflict marriages. Here's what the best evidence suggests: most current divorces leave children worse off, educationally and financially, than they would have been if their parents stay married, and a majority of divorces leave children psychologically worse off as well. Only a minority of divorces in this country are taking place in families where children are likely to benefit in any way from their parents' separation. (pp. 147-148)

  1. MANY LATER REGRET DIVORCE

Once people have made the decision to divorce, how do they later feel about the choice? There may be some immediate relief in many instances right after the divorce, but how do husbands and wives feel months or even years later? My current estimates are that about one-third of the couples who divorce feel they made the right decision, another one-third are uncertain or have mixed feelings about their divorce, and approximately one-third of divorced couples eventually regret the decision within five years.

In addition, many divorced people in the United States apparently wish they had made a greater effort to make their marriage work. In Minnesota , 66 percent of those who are currently divorced answered "yes" to the question "Do you wish you and your ex-spouse had tried harder to work through your differences?" And in a New Jersey poll, 46 percent of divorced people reported that they wished they and their ex-spouse had tried harder to work through their differences. Research from Australia indicates that of people who divorce "one third regret the decision five years later. Of the individuals involved, two in five (40 percent) believe their divorce could have been avoided" (William J. Doherty, 1999)

A recent letter-to-the editor in a large U.S. newspaper reflected the sentiments of one man among the estimated one-third who regretted his divorce. Under the title "Divorce Isn't Worth the Cost," he wrote:

I would wish to comment on the letter that ran Jan. 2 concerning the weakening of men and children through divorce. Anne Smart-Pearce was the author. To my great sorrow, I must admit I am a divorced husband and father. Anne speaks of the terrible price that is being paid and then asks, "If a mother had an equal fear of losing her children, would she so readily seek a divorce? Or would she do all in her power to avert such a tragic outcome?"

Might I add this, husbands and wives, if there is even one-half of an

ounce of friendliness left in your marriage, take each other by the hand, look at each other's eyes and then remember of the love that brought you together in the first place! Let each other know, somehow, that you are needed, loved and wanted! If you fail, you will reap the whirlwind, especially you, fathers. You will lose all that is important, near and dear to you. And that is your sweet wife, your wonderful children and your home.

Oh, that I had been more wise and not let my pride be my downfall. I can tell you with knowledge that a seemingly endless tragedy does await! The mornings do come when you awake, call her name and then realize that you are alone in a house that is ever silent and does not answer back. Guy M. Bradley, West Point , Utah ( Deseret News, Wednesday, January 11, 2001, Letters to the Editor, A-10)

  1. SHOULD COUPLES WORK ON THEIR MARRIAGE?

If a large number of couples who do divorce later regret the decision, the logical question arises: Should couples try to restore what they once had in their marriage? The answer to this question is a simple "yes," in a large number of cases. Many have learned to do so as reported by Michele Weiner Davis in her book Divorce Busting:

It appears that more and more couples are beginning to take a skeptical view of divorce. Some say the growing threat of AIDS is keeping couples together. However, my explanation is different. I believe that people are beginning to realize how devastating divorce is-emotionally, financially, and spiritually-for everyone involved. With enough time under our belts to have observed the results of rampant divorce, we are beginning to recognize the price we have paid for the freedom of disposable marriages. (p. 27)

Nearly all, if not all, marriages go through peaks and valleys, times of highs and lows. Most of married life, however, is spent cycling between these two extremes. During difficult times, between 40-50 percent of currently married spouses seek divorce and follow through with it. And, as previously noted, about 20 percent of those who stay married consider leaving a marriage partner but later choose not to do so.

Apparently many married couples seriously contemplate divorce, may even see a lawyer or file for divorce, and then decide not to proceed with the terminating process. In Utah , for example, in the year 2000, 12,574 couples filed for divorce, but only 10,138 divorces were actually granted (CORIS Database, 2000). Thus, for various reasons, one in five couples who filed for divorce decided not to continue the termination process. Their decision may be well-founded. The vast majority of unhappily married couples in the United States apparently do improve their relationship if they stay married.

  1. THE BIG BOUNCE BACK.

In their recent book, The Case For Marriage, Waite and Gallagher, ask and then answer this question:

How many unhappy couples turn their marriages around? The truth is shocking: 86 percent of unhappily married people who stick it out find that, five years later, their marriages are happier, according to an analysis of the National Survey of Families And Households. Most say, they've become very happy indeed. In fact, nearly three-fifths of those who said their marriage was unhappy in the late 80's and who stay married, rated this same marriage as either "very happy" or "quite happy" when reinterviewed in the early 1990's.

The very worst marriages showed the most dramatic turnarounds: 77 percent of the stably married people who rated their marriage as very unhappy (a one on a scale of one to seven) in the late eighties said that the same marriage was either "very happy" or "quite happy" five years later. Permanent marital unhappiness is surprisingly rare among couples who stick it out. Five years later, just 15 percent of those who initially said they were very unhappy married (and who stayed married) ranked their marriage as not unhappy at all. (pp. 148-149; italics added)

In the last paragraph of their book, Waite and Gallagher conclude:

Decades of social-science research have confirmed the deepest intuitions of the human heart: as frightening, exhilarating, and improbable as this wild vow of constancy may seem, there is no substitute. When love seeks permanence, a safe home for children, who long for both parents, when men and women look for someone they can count on, there are no substitutes. The word for what we want is marriage. (p. 203)

  1. CALCULATE THE FINANCIAL CONSEQUENCES OF TERMINATING YOUR MARRIAGE.

The financial costs to married couples for divorce are often substantial. These costs include legal or lawyers' fees, which average $7,000 per couple ($3,500 per person) in the United States (Nock, 1999). Some divorces cost more; others less. An uncontested divorce involving no children in Utah costs between $500-$1,000. If the proceedings go to court and there is litigation, costs go as high as $10,000-$20,000 for legal fees. If there is a sizeable amount of property and prolonged litigation, costs could be $40,000-$60,000 and even as high as $100,000 or more in some cases. The hourly wage for many lawyers today is $200-$300. The use of accredited divorce mediation services can help reduce the financial costs of divorce.

There will also be additional costs for housing, moving expenses, transportation, potential loss of income during divorce proceedings and transition, additional occupational training-particularly for custodial spouse of children (if children are involved), child care, partial loss of retirement benefits and sometimes additional costs to state government, extended family members and charities if initial income is minimal. There may also be considerable financial consequences during retirement for husband, wife, or both.

Also, recall the previous report cited: "Families with children that were not poor before

the divorce see their income drop as much as 50 percent. Almost 50 percent of the parents with children that are going through a divorce move into poverty after the divorce." (Fagan and Rector, "The Effects of Divorce on America .") Perhaps the greatest costs of divorce, however, are not financial, but the emotional costs that were previous noted.

  1. THINK ABOUT THE LONG-TERM CONSEQUENCES OF YOUR DECISION.

Many who divorce are satisfied with the decision to end their marriage. But it is becoming increasing evident that a significant number, as many as one-third, later regret their divorce. This is particularly so when the long-term consequences are experienced or actually encountered. Seriously consider not only the apparent immediate benefits of divorce but also the long-term consequences many others have experienced. Divorce is a decision that many make but later regret. And most divorces are forever.

  1. CONSIDER YOUR CHILDREN, IF YOU HAVE THEM.

If you do file for divorce in Utah and you have children, you will be required to attend a two-hour class on divorce education before your divorce is granted. This class is not designed to tell you whether you should divorce but rather reviews how to deal with it to have the least negative impact on children. It may be that some couples who file for divorce and attend the required divorce education class are among those who decide not to proceed with the termination of their marriage. Perhaps serious thought of the impact of divorce on children should precede filing for divorce as well. Reread Points To Ponder #3 concerning children.

  1. TAKE TIME TO MAKE YOUR DECISION.

As noted at the beginning of this article, your decision whether to divorce is one of the most important ones you will ever make. And if you do decide not to divorce right away and want to work on improving your marriage, take several months to do so. Also remember that, as previously noted, 86 percent of unhappily married couples bounce back within five years. Your marriage, however, may not take as long to turn around. Also, be aware of questionable advice you may receive during this time from others, particularly peers who are divorced or unhappily married. Remember, love lost can be regained in time with new skills and effort.

  1. USE DISCRETION WHEN SEEKING MARRIAGE COUNSELING.
If you do seek marriage counseling, be very careful in choosing your therapist. Make sure the therapist understands your desire to work on improving your marriage. Also, make sure the therapist has been trained in helping couples stay together, where possible. Ask your therapist to help you in this endeavor. Professional and competent counselors will honor this request. Discuss the fees in advance, which range from $60 to $100 or more for a fifty-minute session. Many Health Maintenance Organizations (HMO's) currently do not pay for marriage counseling. In addition, if you seek personal counseling, HMO's will often determine who you will see and the number of sessions you are allowed. Choose wisely from among the therapists allowed on your insurance program, if you have one. Remember: they are working for you and your marriage! Before you choose a counselor, review the article "How Therapy Can Be

Hazardous to Your Marital Health," by William J. Doherty, Ph.D. Read his comments about "therapy-induced marital suicide." (Find the article on the home page of www.smartmarriages.com.)

  1. CONSULT WITH YOUR RELIGIOUS LEADERS OR ADVISORS.

If you and/or your spouse are religious people and belong to a particular faith or denomination, I urge you to seriously consider talking to your religious leaders. They often are a great source of hope and encouragement by adding the spiritual dimension to marriage during difficult times. Consider attending religious services while you are making your decision about divorce. Married couples who do attend religious services on a weekly basis have a one-third lower divorce rate than those who do not. (Larson, et. al. p. 246)

  1. LEARN FROM OTHER MARRIED COUPLES WHO HAVE BEEN AT THE CROSSROADS.

There are couples in the United States who have seriously considered divorce and then decided to work on their marriages and stay together. Some of these couples are available to conduct seminars and workshops. One such national and nondenominational group is Retrouvaille (A French word meaning "rediscovery" and pronounced "retro-vi".) When both husband and wife attend Retrouvaille meetings and work at their marriage, the success rate of staying together is 85 percent. See their web site at www.retrouvaille.org. For information on Retrouvaille in Utah , call 801-773-4587.

  1. CAREFULLY CONSIDER READING ANY OR ALL OF THE FOLLOWING BOOKS:

•  Diane Medved, The Case Against Divorce, New York, Donald I. Fine, Inc. 1989

•  Michele Weiner Davis, The Divorce Remedy: The Proven 7-Step Program for Saving Your Marriage, New York , Simon and Schuster, 2001

•  Michele Weiner Davis, Divorce Busting; A Step-By Step Approach To Making Your Marriage Loving Again, New York , Simon And Schuster, 1992

•  Judith S. Wallerstein, Julia M. Lewis and Sandra Blakeslee, The Unexpected Legacy of Divorce, New York , Hyperion, 2000.

•  Linda J. Waite and Maggie Gallagher, The Case for Marriage: Why Married People Are Happier, Healthier, and Better Off Financially, New York , Doubleday, 2000.

•  Howard Markman, Scott Stanley, and Susan Blumburg, Fighting For Your Marriage, New York , Jossey-Bass Publishers, 2001.

•  Glenn T. Stanton, Why Marriage Matters, Colorado Springs , Colorado , Pinon Press, 1997

•  James Dobson, Love Must Be Tough: New Hope for Families in Crisis , Nashville , Word Publishing, 1996. (This book was written with suggestions for husbands or wives who are in the process of losing a spouse to another person, excessive hours at work, or various kinds of addiction such as drugs or pornography. Written from a Christian perspective, this book has been helpful to many.)

[If the books recommended are not available in your local libraries or bookstores, they

can usually be obtained within a week on web sites such as www.amazon.com, www.half.com and others.]

  1. VISIT & REVIEW THE FOLLOWING WEB SITES.

•  www.utahmarriage.org This web site has been created with Utah residents in mind. Married couples and/or individuals can go to this web site to access information and/or resources that may be helpful. Or, they may phone the toll free number 1-800-472-4716 for additional help and information. People in Salt Lake , Summit , Tooele and Utah Counties can simply dial 211.

•  www.divorcebusting.com This web site has many tips for helping couples with marriage. Michele Weiner Davis has also created a ten-hour audiocassette program and workbook titled "Keeping Love Alive" advertised on this web site. It costs $59.95 plus $5.95 S&H and is highly recommended. Instructions are also given on this web site on how to become "Keeping Love Alive" group leaders in your community.

•  www.smartmarriages.com was created and is maintained by Diane Sollee. This web site lists a number of current articles on marriage and marriage education programs available throughout the United States . Numerous organizations promoting marriage are also listed. A few questions are posted to test your knowledge about contemporary marriage. Information on the annual Smart Marriage Conference is provided and you can also subscribe to the free e-mail newsletter listed on the web site.

•  www.marriagemovement.org This twenty-nine page document describes the current Marriage Movement in the United States . You are invited to read it and be a signer if you care to endorse the document. (I was honored to be one of the thirty individuals who attended the first meeting in New York on January 25, 2000, and was also one of the original one hundred signers of the document.)

•  www.family.org This web site has many helpful materials on marriage from Focus on the Family, a Christian Organization founded by Dr. James Dobson.

•  www.divorcereform.org This web site has fascinating trends in divorce reform legislation in the United States and some interesting statistics on contemporary divorce.

  1. REMEMBER THE 911 ALERT!

Almost everyone in the United States will remember September 11, 2001 [ninth month, eleventh day] when the two planes crashed into the World Trade Center in New York City and another plane crashed into the Pentagon Building in Washington , D.C. and fourth in Pennsylvania . We all witnessed over and over the tragic details of these events and the aftermath as it was broadcast again and again on national and local television programs. These vivid images will likely remain with us for many years to come.

What some may not know, however, is that immediately following these tragic events, many married couples withdrew their applications for divorce on file before September 11, 2001. In Houston , Texas , for example, "Dismissals in divorce cases have skyrocketed in the Harris County Family Law courts since the terrorist attacked of September 11th. Family-law cases, the vast majority of which are divorces, have been dismissed in nearly three times the volume in the days after the tragedy as in the days before it." (Mary Flood, Houston Chronicle, September 25, 2001.) Similar trends apparently occurred elsewhere.

What does this trend after September 11, 2001, suggest? Why were so many military personnel married in the following weeks before they were deployed for duty abroad? Why is it that in times of crisis we place higher value on marriage and family relationships? Michael Von Blon, a family law attorney in Texas , stated that in times of tragedy, "people stop and think about the most basic things in life-companionship, love and family." (Ibid.) Why do we need a national tragedy to remind us, once again, of the importance of marriage and family relationships? Apparently, such events help us realize the value of ancient wisdom:

Two are better than one; because they have a good reward for their labour. For if they fall, the one will lift up his fellow; but woe to him that is alone when he falleth; for he hath not another to help him up. Again, if two lie togther, then they have heat: but how can one be warm alone? And if one prevail against him, two shall withstand him; and a threefold cord is not quickly broken. ( Ecclesiastes 4:9-12)

In this pamphlet, "Marriage Crossroads: Why Divorce Is Often Not the Best Option," I have tried to present a balance by first noting there are situations when divorce is warranted. It is evident that some individuals are better off not married to each other. I also have indicated and stated the reasons why I believe it is beneficial for many, if not most, husbands and wives to stay together and work through their differences in their marriage. Hopefully, married couples will take the time to make an "informed decision" when contemplating divorce.

Over two thousand years ago, Roman statesman and orator Marcus Tullius Cicero (106-43 B.C.) stated, "The first bond of society is marriage." I believe it still is.

References

Amato, Paul R. and Booth, Alan: A Generation At Risk; Growing Up in an Era of Family Upheaval. Cambridge , Massachusetts : Harvard University Press, 1997.

Arp, David and Arp, Claudia: The Second Half of Marriage. Grand Rapids , Michigan : Zondervan Publishing House, 1998.

Coombs, Robert H. UCLA School of Medicine "Marital Status and Personal Well-Being: A Literature Review." Family Relations, Vol. 40, January 1991, pp 100-101.

CORIS Database: 2000 (Court Record and Information System), Information Services Department, State of Utah .

Dobson, James C.: Love Must Be Tough: New Hope for Families in Crisis. Nashville , Tennessee : Word Publishing, 1996.

Doherty, William J.: "Questions and Answers on the Minnesota Covenant Marriage Option," University of Minnesota , 1999. Available on the Smart Marriage Home page, www.smartmarriages.com.

Fagan, Patrick R. and Rector, Robert: "The Effects Of Divorce on America " Executive Summary, June 5, 2000, The Heritage Foundation, 214 Massachusetts Ave. N.E. , Washington , D.C. (Available on Smart Marriage Home Page under Marriage Reports. www.smartmarriages.com)

Larson, David B., Swyers, James P. and Larson, Susan S.: The Costly Consequences of Divorce: Assessing the Clinical, Economic, and Public Health Impact of Marital Disruption in the United States . Published by National Institute for Healthcare Research. Rockville , Maryland , 1995.

Laumann-Billings, Lisa and Emery, Robert E.: "Distress Among Young Adults from Divorced Families," Journal of Family Psychology, December 2000, Vol. 14 (4) pp. 671-687.

Markman, Howard, Stanley, Scott and Blumburg, Susan: Fighting For Your Marriage. New York , New York : Jossey-Bass Publishers, 2001.

"Marriage In America : A Report to the Nation" 1995, Council on Families in America . Institute for American Values, 1841 Broadway, Suite 211 , New York , New York 10023 .

Medved, Diane: The Case Against Divorce: Discover the Lures, the Lies, and the Emotional Traps of Divorcee - - Plus the Seven Vital Reasons to Stay Together. New York , New York : Donald I. Fine, Inc. 1989.

Nock, Steve: "Calculating the Financial Cost of Divorce." The Department of Sociology, University of Charlottesville , Virginia . Presentation at the Smart Marriages Conference, Washington , D.C. 1999.

Olson, David H. and Defrain, John: Marriage and the Family, Diversity and Strengths. Mountain View , California : Mayfield Publishing Company, 1994.

Rainey, Dennis: Staying Close: Stopping the Natural Drive Toward Isolation in Marriage. Dallas , Texas : Word Publishing, 1992.

Stanton, Glenn T.: Why Marriage Matters. Colorado Springs , Colorado : Pinon Press, 1997.

Waite, Linda J. and Gallagher, Maggie: The Case for Marriage: Why Married People Are Happier, Healthier, and Better Off Financially. New York , New York : DoubleDay, 2000.

Wallerstein, Judith, Lewis, Julia M. and Blakeslee, Sandra: The Unexpected Legacy of Divorce, A Twenty-Five Year Landmark Study. New York , New York : Hyperion, 2000.

Weiner Davis, Michele: Divorce Busting; A Step-by Step Approach to Making Your Marriage Loving Again. New York , New York : Simon And Schuster, 1992.

Biography

Dr. Brent A. Barlow was born in Centerfield, Sanpete County , Utah and received his Bachelor of Science (BS) and Master of Arts (MA) degrees from Brigham Young University . He later

received his Ph D in Marriage and Family Relations at Florida State University . Dr. Barlow is currently a clinical member of The American Association For Marriage and Family Therapy and a member of The American Association of Christian Counselors. He has taught marriage and family classes at four major universities in the United States : Florida State University, Southern Illinois University, University of Wisconsin-Stout , and currently teaches at Brigham Young University in Provo , Utah . Dr. Barlow also wrote a weekly newspaper column on marriage for the Deseret News in Salt Lake City for eleven years and is the author of six books on marriage. He and his wife, Susan, are the parents of seven children and have eight grandchildren. Dr. Barlow has served as chair of the Governor's Commission on Marriage in Utah since 1998.

Brent A. Barlow, Ph.D.
1111 East 1045 North
Orem , Utah , 84097
Phone: 801-378-1293
FAX: 801-378-4385
email: brentabarlow@aol.com

 

Recommended reading for inspiration, instruction & insight on marriage relationships:

What If I Married the Wrong Person?
by Dr. Richard Matteson and Janis Long Harris. Bethany House Publishers, 1996. 250 pages.
Excellent, practical resource for every married couple. We've all asked the frightening question at some point in our marriage, "Did I marry the right person?" Usually, that question is reflective of a deep struggle or dissatisfaction with some part of our relationship with our spouse. Whether it be a wide range of life disappointments, offensive personal behavior or a chasm of dissimilar beliefs, this book can be a bridge to resolving differences. Throughout this book, the authors continue to challenge the reader to re-examine how they think about their spouse, their marriage and their perception of what it means to be in a committed relationship. There are assignments at the end of each chapter that are very helpful and that will stretch and strengthen a marriage. Highly recommended resource for pastoral counselors. Not recommended for small group use or Sunday school.

The Divorce Remedy: The Proven 7-Step Program for Saving Your Marriage
by Michelle Weiner-Davis
This book is a must read for anyone contemplating divorce or involved in a marriage threatened by divorce. Parents or friends of couples in troubled marriages can also benefit. Michelle has a message of hope and methods that work. Convinced there is no hope for your marriage? Read this book. If not for yourself, read it for your children 's sake.

Reconciling God's Way Workbook
by Joe and Michelle Williams
This rebuilding marriage workbook is designed for a use by one person and an accountability partner over 12 weeks. Reconciling God's Way is effective because it focuses on the Biblical plan for marriage and the dynamics of a Christ-centered relationship. Available through Every Marriage Matters.

Covenant Marriage
by Fred Lowery
This book shows you how to go beyond commitment so you can have a covenant marriage that will last a lifetime.

The Five Love Languages
by Gary Chapman
Different people express love in different ways. If you understand each other's love languages, you can learn to give and receive love more effectively.

The Good Marriage: How and Why Love Lasts
by Judith S. Wallerstein, Sandra Blakeslee
Inspired by the hope that the experience of satisfied husbands and wives might provide useful lessons to others, the authors interviewed 50 couples who had been married nine years or more. This book tells why these strong marriages flourish.

His Needs, Her Needs: Building an Affair-Proof Marriage
by Willard F. Harley Jr.
Marriage works only when each spouse takes the time to consider the other's needs and strives to meet them. The author identifies ten most vital needs of men and women and shows husbands and wives how to satisfy those needs in their spouses.

A Lasting Promise
by Scott Stanley, Daniel Trathen, Savanna McCain, Milt Bryan
Based on the best-selling book, Fighting for Your Marriage, this book will help you create a marriage of lasting love. The powerful and practical principles are solidly supported by Scripture with a unique blending of university research.

Redeeming Love
by Francine Rivers
A novel every couple should read which shows what marital love really looks like. It retells the story of Hosea in the gold country of California in the 1850's.

The Second Half of Marriage
by David Arp, Claudia Arp
The Second Half of Marriage is full of rich insights into marriage in later life and the many challenges and hopes it offers.

Secrets to Lasting Love
by Gary Smalley
Gary Smalley's gift for helping couples create more meaningful communication and deeper understanding so that they can establish an unwavering bond is the inspiration behind Secrets to Lasting Love, the culmination of Smalley's decades of work.

Seven Principles to Making Your Marriage Work
by John Gottman
This foremost marriage researcher looks at the basic principles to guide couples to a harmonious and long lasting relationship, packed with practical questionnaires and exercises.

Sacred Marriage
by Gary Thomas
This instant classic asks, "What if God is more concerned about your holiness than your happiness?" Maybe a healthy marriage is more about character than compatibility.

Sheet Music
by Kevin Leman
With humor and insight this best selling author explores the importance of a healthy sexual relationship in a forthright manner toward building an intimacy that lasts a lifetime.

When Bad Things Happen to Good Marriages
by Drs. Les and Leslie Parrott
No matter how good your marriage is, it's not invulnerable. Bad things happen to the best of marriages. The question isn't whether you'll face struggles as a couple, but how you'll handle them when they come. When the going gets tough, what does it take to preserve - and in the long run, even strengthen - your union?

Unbelieving Husbands and the Wives Who Love Them
by Michael Fanstone. Vine Books-Servant Publications, 1994. 143 pages.
His short resource is packed with information on this critically important issue for many believers- their marriage to an unbelieving husband. For whatever reasons, good or bad, many female believers find themselves married to a man who does not share their faith. The key question for them is their response, perspective and how to share their belief without driving their husband away. The author addresses all of these issues and many others. The author focuses on helping women better understand their needs and those of their husband. He also shares how children can successfully cope with the special hardships created by "unequal yokes." Finally, this book offers some ideas how women can be used by God to draw their unbelieving husband to himself. This is a recommended reading resource for every family life/counseling pastor. Also recommended for use in counseling with women who are married to an unbelieving spouse.

Marriage Clues For The Clueless
Len Woods, Christopher Hudson, et al. Promise Press, 1999. 237 pages.
Another helpful resource that addresses how one can have an enjoyable marriage. What I like about this compact book is that it is loaded with lot's of tips that even us dummies can latch on. Though the book is compact, it is loaded with such helpful ideas as keeping your love alive, romancing your spouse, understanding how children change a marriage, the empty nest syndrome, etc. This is a recommended book for seasoned couples and it is especially applicable as couples celebrate their anniversary. This book is recommended for every married couple and would be an excellent resource for a small group study of couples or a Sunday School class.

Articles

Research Suggests Children of Divorce More Likely to End Their Own Marriages

June 27, 2005 -- Children of divorced parents often bitterly vow not to repeat the same mistakes. They want to avoid putting themselves and their own children through the pain that comes from the dissolution of a marriage. But, according to University of Utah researcher Nicholas H. Wolfinger, these children's aspirations face unfavorable odds.

"Growing up in a divorced family greatly increases the chances of ending one's own marriage, a phenomenon called the divorce cycle or the intergenerational transmission of divorce," says Wolfinger, assistant professor in the University of Utah's Department of Family and Consumer Studies.

Wolfinger has spent a decade studying the marriages of children from divorced homes in America. These children are more likely to marry as teens, cohabitate and marry someone who is also a child of divorced parents. And they are also one-third less likely to marry if they are over age 20.Wolfinger's new book is devoted entirely to the divorce cycle. "Understanding the Divorce Cycle: The Children of Divorce in Their Own Marriages," published by Cambridge University Press, contains important information for those interested in divorce and its repercussions and for policy makers who determine family and divorce law.

"Divorce is an important topic because it has so many consequences for well-being," writes Wolfinger, also an adjunct assistant professor in the University's Department of Sociology. "Its transmission between generations adds a whole new dimension by perpetuating the cycle of divorce. . The divorce cycle, in short, can be thought of as a cascade. Ending a marriage starts a cycle that threatens to affect increasing numbers of people over time, a sobering thought in an era when half of all new marriages fail."

Wolfinger's research also suggests that if one spouse comes from divorced parents, the couple may be up to twice as likely to divorce. Spouses who are both children of divorced parents are three times more likely to divorce as couples who both hail from intact families.

Besides observing the marital stability of the offspring of divorced couples, Wolfinger's 180-page book provides perspective on how parental divorce affects offspring marriage timing, mate selection, cohabitating relationships as well as historical trends in the divorce cycle. Wolfinger also explores the divorce reform movement in America and argues in favor of no-fault divorce laws, arguing that a return to an age of tough divorce laws would recreate the social conditions that used to make divorce harder on children.

"One reason children from divorced families get divorced more often is because they have a tendency to marry as teenagers," Wolfinger reports, adding "the older you are when you marry, the less likely you are to get divorced. It's good advice for everyone."

On the other hand, the more transitions children experience while growing up, the more they will experience as adults, Wolfinger notes. "What is the hardest for kids is how many disruptions they experience-the up-and-down cycles. Many will have stepparents, and some will see their new families dissolve. A disruption occurs any time they lose a parent-except from death. That's different, and doesn't have the same negative effects on children. Divorce is ambiguous. Children wonder whether the divorce was their fault or who is to blame. And they wonder 'Is he coming back?'"

Wolfinger writes, "It is certainly good news that people are less likely to stay in high conflict marriages than they used to." However, "ending a low-conflict marriage may hurt children as much as staying in a high-conflict family," and the odds of divorce transmission are actually highest if parents dissolve a marriage after little or no conflict.

"The most interesting finding," Wolfinger says, is that "some of the negative consequences of growing up in a divorced family, including stigmatization, are less severe because divorce has become more common."

Ultimately, Wolfinger shows that the divorce cycle can primarily be attributed to the lessons children learn about relationship skills and marital commitment, and secondarily to the effects of parental divorce on offspring marriage formation behavior and educational attainment.

Wolfinger's research is based on the National Survey of Families and Households, which included detailed information on family background for 13,000 people, and the General Social Survey, which surveyed 20,000 people over a 30-year period. The Bireley Foundation helped fund Wolfinger's book.

Nicholas H. Wolfinger, U of U Department of Family and Consumer Studies:
801-364-3283, nick.wolfinger@fcs.utah.edu

Ann Bardsley, U of U Public Relations:
801-587-9183, abardsley@ucomm.utah.edu

Shattered Vows: Getting Beyond Betrayal
By Shirley Glass, Ph.D.
Psychology Today/ July-August 1998

Hold on to your wedding ring: It is difficult, but not impossible, to repair the damage caused by infidelity. Increasingly, that's what couples want-likely the White House occupants, too. But let go of most of your assumptions; In an interview with Editor at Large Hara Estroff Marano, our leading expert Dr. Shirley Glass challenges just about everything you think you know about the most explosive subject of the year.

Q: What is the single most important thing you want people to know about infidelity?
Dr. G.  Boundaries. That it is possible to love somebody else, to be attracted to somebody else, even if you have a good marriage. In this collegial world where we work together, you have to conduct yourself by being aware of appropriate boundaries, by not creating opportunities, particularly at a time when you might be vulnerable.

That means that if you travel together, you never invite someone for a drink in the room; if you just had a fight with your spouse, you don't discuss it with a person who could be a potential partner.

You can have a friendship, but you have to be careful who you share your deepest feelings with. Although women share their deep feelings with lots of people, particularly other women, men are usually most comfortable sharing their feelings in a love relationship. As a result, when a relationship becomes intimate and emotional, men tend to sexualize it. -

Q: Infidelity appears to be the topic of the year. What has struck you most about the reaction to what may or may not be some kind of infidelity in high places?
Dr. G. Whatever horror or dismay people have about it, they're able to separate the way the President is performing in office and the way he appears to be performing in his marriage. That's especially interesting because it seems to reflect the split in his life. We don't know for sure, but he apparently is very much involved in his family life. He's not an absentee father or absentee husband. Whatever it is that they share-and they do share a lot, publicly and privately- he has a compartment in which he is attracted to young women, and it is separate from his primary relationships.

Q:  Is this compartmentalizing characteristic of people who get into affairs?
Dr. G.  It's much more characteristic of men. Most women believe that if you love your partner, you wouldn't even be in an affair; therefore, if someone has an affair, it means that they didn't love their partner and they do love the person that they had the affair with. But my research has shown that there are many men who do love their partners, who enjoy good sex at home, who nevertheless never turn down an opportunity for extramarital sex. In fact, 56 percent of the men I sampled who had extramarital intercourse said that their marriages were happy, versus 34 percent of the women.

That's how I got into this.

Q:  Because?
Dr. G. Being a woman, I believed that if a man had an affair, it meant that he had a terrible marriage, and that he probably wasn't getting it at home-the old keep-your-husband-happy-so-he-won't-stray idea. That puts too much of a burden on the woman. I found that she could be everything wonderful, and he might still stray, if that's in his value system, his family background, or his psycho dynamic structure.
  
I was in graduate school when I heard that a man I knew, married for over 40 years, had recently died and his wife was so bereaved because they had had the most wonderful marriage. He had been her lover, her friend, her support system. She missed him immensely. I thought that was a beautiful story. When I told my husband about it, he got a funny look that made me ask, What do you know? He proceeded to tell me that one night when he took the kids out for dinner to an out of the way restaurant, owned by one of his clients, that very man walked in with a young, blonde woman. When he saw my husband, his face got red, and he walked out.

Q: How did that influence you?
Dr. G. I wondered what that meant. Did he fool his wife all those years and really not love her? How is it possible to be married for over 40 years and think you have a good marriage?  It occurred to me that an affair could mean something different than I believe.

Another belief that was an early casualty was the hydraulic pump theory-that you only have so much energy for something. By this belief, if your partner is getting sex outside, you would know it, because your partner wouldn't be wanting sex at home. However, some people are even more passionate at home when they are having extramarital sex. I was stunned to hear a man tell me that when he left his affair partner and came home he found himself desiring his wife more than he had in a long time, because he was so sexually aroused by his affair. That made me question the hydraulic pump theory.

Many of our beliefs about the behavior of others come from how we see things for ourselves. A man who usually associates sneaking around with having sex will, if his wife is sneaking around, find it very hard to believe that she could be emotionally involved without being sexually involved. On the other hand, a woman usually can not believe that her husband could be sexually involved and not be emotionally involved. We put the same meaning on it for our partner that it would have for us. I call that the error of assumed similarity.

Q: What research have you done on infidelity?
Dr. G.  My first research study was actually based on a sex questionnaire in Psychology Today, in the Seventies. I analyzed the data looking at the relationship of extramarital sex, length of marriage, and gender difference on marital satisfaction and romanticism.

I found enormous gender differences: that men in long term marriages who had affairs had very high marital satisfaction-and that women in long-term marriages having affairs had the lowest marital satisfaction of all. Everybody's marital satisfaction went down the longer they were married, except the men who had affairs. But in early marriages, men who had affairs were significantly less happy. An affair is more serious if it happens earlier in the marriage.

Explaining these gender differences was the basis of my dissertation. I theorized that the men were having sexual affairs and the women emotional affairs.

Q:  Are affairs about sex?
Dr. G. Sometimes infidelity is just about sex. That is often more true for men. In my research, 44 percent of men who said they had extramarital sex said they had slight or no emotional involvement; only 11 percent of women said that. Oral sex is certainly about sex. Some spouses are more upset if the partner had oral sex with an affaire than if they had intercourse; it just seems so much more intimate.

Q: What is the infidelity?
Dr. G.  The infidelity is that you took something that was supposed to be mine, which is sexual or emotional intimacy, and you gave it to somebody else. I thought that we had a special relationship, and now you have contaminated it; it doesn't feel special any more, because you shared something that was very precious to us with someone else.

There are gender differences. Men feel more betrayed by their wives having sex with someone else; women feel more betrayed by their husbands being emotionally involved with someone else. What really tears men apart is to visualize their partner being sexual with somebody else.

Women certainly don't want their husbands having sex with somebody else, but if it's an impersonal one-night fling, they may be able to deal with that better than if their husband was involved in a long-term relationship sharing all kinds of loving ways with somebody else.

Q:  Why are affairs so deeply wounding?
Dr. G.  Because you have certain assumptions about your marriage. That I chose someone, and the other person chose me; we have the same values; we have both decided to have an exclusive relationship, even though we may have some problems. We love each other and therefore I am safe.

When you find out your partner has been unfaithful, then everything you believe is totally shattered. And you have to rebuild the world. The fact that you weren't expecting it, that it wasn't part of your assumption about how a relationship operates, causes traumatic reactions.

Q: And it is deeply traumatic.
Dr. G.  It's terrible-unless you cheated on each other during your engagement, or you or your partner came from a family where everybody cheated on everybody, or you come from certain cultures where the women don't take it that much to heart, because that's the way men are thought to be.

The wounding results because -and I've heard this so many  times-I finally thought I met somebody I could trust.

Q:  It violates that hope or expectation that you can be who you really are with another person?
Dr. G.  Yes. Affairs really aren't about sex; they're about betrayal. Imagine if you were married to somebody very patriotic and then found out your partner is a Russian spy. Someone having a long-term affair is leading a double life. Then you find out all that was going on in your partner's life that you knew nothing about: Gifts that were exchanged, poems and letters that were written, trips you thought were taken for a specific reason were actually taken to meet the affair partner.

To find out about all the intrigue and deception that occurred while you were operating under a different assumption is totally shattering and disorienting. That's why people then have to get out their calendars and go back over the dates to put all the missing pieces together: when you were going to the drugstore that night and you said your car broke down and you didn't come home for three hours, what was really happening?

Q:  This is necessary?
Dr. G.  In order to heal. Because any time somebody suffers from a trauma, part of the recovery is telling the story. The tornado victim will go over and over the  story-"when the storm came I was in my room."-trying to understand what happened, and how it happened. Didn't we see the black clouds?  How come we didn't know?"

Q:  And so they repeat the story until it no longer creates an unmanageable level of arousal.
Dr. G.  Yes. In fact, sometimes people are more devastated if everything was wonderful before they found out. When a betrayed spouse who suspected something says, "I don't know if I can ever trust my partner again," it is reassuring is to tell them that they can trust their own instincts the next time they have those storm warnings. When things feel okay, they can trust that things are okay. But if somebody thought everything was wonderful, how  would they ever know if it happened again? It's frightening.

Q:  You mentioned to me that one question people these days are asking you is, is oral sex really infidelity?
Dr. G.  The question they ask is, is oral sex really adultery?  And that's a different question, because adultery is a legal term. It is also a Biblical term.

I don't know what the answer is legally. In the Old Testament, adultery was when a man had intercourse with another man's wife. If the woman was single, it was not adultery even if he was married. Because women were possessions, and you're not supposed to take something that belongs to somebody else.

Q: Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor's wife.
Dr. G. Or his ox. The real issue is, is oral sex infidelity? You don't need to ask a psychologist that question-just ask any spouse: Would you feel that it was an infidelity for your partner to engage in that type of behavior?

Q:  Would women answer that differently from men?
Dr. G. It is not necessarily a function of gender. People might answer it differently for themselves than for their partners. Some people maintain a kind of technical virginity, by not having intercourse. That was often true of premarital sexual behavior in more conservative times. However, even kissing in a romantic, passionate way is an infidelity. People know when they cross that line from friendship to affair.

Q:  So you don't have to have intercourse to have an affair?
Dr. G. Absolutely. There can be an affair without any kind of touching at all. People have affairs on the Internet.

Q:  What is the sine qua non of an affair?
Dr. G.  Three elements determine whether a relationship is an affair.

One is secrecy. Suppose two people meet every morning at seven o'clock for coffee before work, and they never tell their partners. Even though it might be in a public place, their partner is not going to be happy about it. It is going to feel like a betrayal, a terrible deception.

Emotional intimacy is the second element. When someone starts confiding things to another person that they are reluctant to confide to their partner, and the emotional intimacy is greater in the friendship than in the marriage, that's very threatening. One common pathway to affairs occurs when somebody starts confiding negative things about their marriage to a person of the opposite sex. What they're doing is  signaling: "I'm vulnerable; I may even be available."

The third element is sexual chemistry. That can occur even if two people don't touch. If one says, "I'm really attracted to you," or  "I had a dream about you last night,  but, of course, I'm married, so we won't do anything about that," that tremendously increases the sexual tension by creating forbidden fruit in the relationship.

Q: Another interesting question you told me people now ask is, "Are you a liar if you lie about an affair?" How do you answer that?
Dr. G.  Lying goes with the territory. If you're not lying, you have an open marriage.

There may be lies of omission or lies of commission. The lie of omission is, "I had to stop at the gym on my way home."  Or, "I had to go to the library." There is the element of truth, but the omission of what was really happening: "I left there after 15 minutes and spent the next 45 minutes at someone's apartment."

The lies of commission are the elaborate deceptions people create. The more deception and the longer it goes on, the more difficult it is to rebuild trust and honesty in the wake of an affair.

Q:  The deception makes a tremendous psychological difference to the betrayed spouse. What about to the person who constructed the deception?
Dr. G. Once the affair's been discovered, the involved partner could have a sense of relief, if they hate lying and don't see themself as having that kind of moral character. They'll say, "I can't understand how I could have done a thing like this, this is not the kind of person I am."

Some people thrive on the game. For them, part of the passion and excitement of an affair is the lying and getting away with something forbidden. Often, since childhood, they've had a whole history of sneaking around. In the marriage, one partner may be fairly parental and judgmental while the other avoids conflict by not being open about things. The affair is an extension of a preexisting pattern.

There are some people who have characterological problems, and the affair may be a symptom of that. Such people lie on their taxes and about their accomplishments; they are fraudulent in business. When it's characterological, I don't know any way to rebuild trust; no one can ever be on sure footing with that person.

Q: So there is always moral compromise just by being in an affair.
Dr. G. Which is why some people, no matter how unhappy they are in their marriage, don't have affairs. They can't make the compromise. Or they feel they have such an open relationship with the spouse that they just could not do something like that without telling their partner about it.

Q: Do affairs ever serve a positive function-not to excuse any of the damage they do?
Dr. G. Affairs are often a chance for people to try out new behaviors, to dress in a different costume, to stretch and grow and assume a different role. In a long-term relationship, we often get frozen in our roles. When young couples begin at a certain level of success and go on to achieve all kinds of things, the new person sees them as they've become, while the old person sees them as they were.

The unfortunate thing is that the way a person is different in the affair would, if incorporated into the marriage, probably make their spouse ecstatic. But they believe they're stuck; they don't know how to create that opportunity for change within the marriage. A woman who was sexually inhibited in marriage-perhaps she married young and had no prior partners-may find her sexuality in an affair, but her husband would probably be delighted to encounter that new self.

Q:  How do you handle this?
Dr. G.  After an affair, I do not ask the question you would expect. The spouse always wants to know about "him or her". "What did you see in her that you didn't see in me?"  Or, "what did you like about him better?"  One man asked, "was it that he had a bigger penis?"

I always ask about "you": "What did you like about yourself in that other relationship?"

How were you different?  And, of the way that you were in that other relationship, what would you like to bring back so that you can be the person you want to be in your primary relationship? How can we foster that part of you in this relationship?

Q: That's a surprising question. How did you come to know that's the question to ask?
Dr. G. There is an attraction in the affair, and I try to understand what it is. Part of it is the romantic projection: I like the way I look when I see myself in the other person's eyes. There is positive mirroring. An affair holds up a vanity mirror, the kind with all the little bulbs around it; it gives a nice rosy glow to the way you see yourself. By contrast, the marriage offers a make-up mirror; it magnifies all your wrinkles and pores, every little flaw. When someone loves you despite the fact that they can see all your flaws, that is a reality-based love.

In the stories of what happened during the affair, people seem to take on a different persona, and one of the things they liked best about being in that relationship was the person they had become. The man who wasn't sensitive or expressive is now in a relationship where he is expressing his feelings and is supportive.

Q: Can those things be duplicated in the marriage?
Dr. G.  That's one of the goals, not to turn the betrayed spouse into the affair partner, but to free the unfaithful spouse to express all the parts of himself he was able to experience in the affair.

I see a lot of men who are married to very competent women and having affairs with very weak women. They feel: "this person needs me." They put on their red cape and do a lot of rescuing. They feel very good about themselves. That makes me sad, because I know that even though their partner may be extremely competent, she wants to be stroked too. She wants a knight in shining armor. Perhaps she hasn't known how to ask for it, or the ways she's asked have pushed him away.

Q:  Do people push their partners into affairs?
Dr. G.  No. People can create a pattern in the marriage that is not enhancing, and the partner, instead of dealing with the dissatisfaction and trying to work on the relationship, escapes it and goes someplace else.

Q: That is the wrong way to solve the problem?
Dr. G.  Yes. There are some gender differences in the ways partners handle problems, although everything we say about men can be true for some women, and everything we say about women can be true for some men. Generally when a woman is unhappy, she lets her partner know. She feels better afterwards because she's gotten it off her chest. It doesn't interfere with her love. She's trying to improve the relationship:  "If I tell him what makes me unhappy, then he will know how to please me; I am giving him a gift by telling him."

Unfortunately, many men don't see it as a gift. They feel criticized and put down. Instead of thinking, "she feels lonely; I will move toward her and make her feel secure," they think, "What is wrong with her?  Didn't I just do that?" They pull away. If they come in contact with somebody else who says to them, "oh, you're wonderful," then they move toward that person. They aren't engaged enough in the marriage to work things out. The partner keeps trying, and becomes more unpleasant because he's not responding

Q:  She becomes the pursuer, he the distancer.
Dr. G.  When she withdraws, the marriage is much further down the road to dissolution, because she's given up. Her husband, unfortunately, thinks things are so much better because she's no longer complaining. He doesn't recognize that she has detached and become emotionally available for an affair. The husband first notices it when she becomes disinterested in sex-or after she's left! Then he'll do anything to keep her. The tragedy is that is often too little too late.

Q:  By then she is often committed to someone on the outside?
Dr. G. Yes, which is why when women have affairs, it's so much more often a result of long-term marital dissatisfaction.

Q. Can you predict which couples will get involved in affairs?
Dr. G.  When we look at predictors, we're really looking at them retrospectively. For example, we know that people who have had affairs have attitudes that are more endorsing of reasons for affairs-but did that attitude take root before or after the affair?  Some research shows that women who have affairs previously talked to other women who had affairs, a way of getting permission.

Social context is a predictor. If you're in an occupational or social group where many people have affairs, and there's a sexually permissive attitude, you're more likely. Also if you come from a family where there's a history of affairs-the most notorious are the Kennedys, where the men have a certain entitlement. Coming from one of the Mediterranean cultures, like the Greek, where the double standard is alive and well, is another predictor.

Q: What you're saying is that an affair is not always about the marriage. There are often cultural pulls or contextual pulls into affairs. This seems to me very important information for women, because women blame themselves.
Dr. G.  And society blames women.

Q: So affairs can happen in good marriages.  Is the marriage really good?
Dr. G. Sometimes one person thinks the marriage is fine and the other doesn't. That may be because the more dissatisfied person hasn't communicated their dissatisfaction. Or they've communicated their dissatisfaction and the partner has discounted it.

But after an affair, people often try to justify it by rewriting unhappiness into the marital history. They say. "I never really loved you," or "you never really acted like you loved me." That is just a way to make themselves feel that they didn't do such a terrible thing.

Q:  Why do some people in unhappy marriages have affairs and others do not?
Dr. G.  Number one is opportunity. Number two is values. Some people do not think an affair is justified for any reason. Others think it's okay if you're not getting it at home, or if you "fall in love" with another person.

Most surveys of attitudes simply ask people whether they approve of extramarital sex. Fully 85 to 90 percent of people say no. But asking more specific questions-such as, do you think it's okay to have an affair for sexual excitement,  or to get understanding or affection-greatly discriminates conditions under which affairs are justified.

These break down according to gender. For women, the highest justification is for love; emotional intimacy is next. Sex is last on their list of justifications. It's the opposite for men; sex scores the highest.

Q:  Is infidelity in a longstanding marriage the same as in one of shorter duration?
Dr. G. It is potentially more threatening to the marriage when it happens earlier, and the chances of the marriage surviving are less, particularly where the woman is having an affair.

Q:  Did she choose the wrong mate?
Dr. G.  She thinks she did, especially if her affair partner is the opposite of her husband.

Q:  From your perspective, what's going on?
Dr. G.  She's growing and changing, and she chooses somebody she sees as more similar to herself. Usually it's someone at work. Her husband may be working very hard in his profession, or going to school, and not paying much attention to her. She feels a little lonely, and then she gets involved. Or maybe her husband is very caring and the relationship is so supportive and stable that it doesn't have a challenge for her.

There is some evidence, from studies in the Sixties and Seventies, that infidelity is more likely early in the marriage among working-class couples. The men haven't yet settled down. Among college educated professionals, affairs generally happen later in the marriage.

Q: The opportunities for affairs have changed radically in the past 20 years. Men and women are together all the time in the workplace, and workplaces are sexy places. You dress up, you are trying your best, there's lots of energy in the air.
Dr. G. And you're not cleaning up vomit or the hot water heater that just flooded the basement. And it's not at the end of the day, when you're exhausted. Also, you're working together on something that has excitement and meaning.

One of the major shifts is that more married women are having affairs than in the past. There are several reasons. Today's woman has usually had more experience with premarital sex, so she's not as inhibited about getting involved sexually with another man. She has more financial independence, so she's not taking as great a risk. And she is working with men on a more equal level, so the men are very attractive to her.

Q: What do people seek in an affair partner?
Dr. G. Either we choose somebody very different from our partner, or we choose somebody like our partner used to be, a younger version. A woman married to a really sweet guy who helps with the dishes, who is very nurturing and very secure, may at some point see him as boring and get interested in the high-achieving, high-energy man who may even be a bit chauvinistic. But if she's married to the man with the power and the status, then she's interested in the guy who is sensitive and touchy-feely, who may not be as ambitious.

Q: Is this just the nature of attraction?
Dr. G.  It has to do with the fact that people really want it all. Probably the only way to get it all is to be in more than one relationship at the same time. We have different parts of ourselves.

The other flip-flop in choice of affair partner reflects the fact that the marriage often represents a healing of our family wounds. Somebody who lacked a secure attachment figure in their family of origin chooses a mate who provides security and stability. It's a healthy, resilient part of ourselves that seeks that balancing.

But after we've mastered that, we often want to go back and find somebody like that difficult parent and make that person love us. There is a correlation between the nature of the attachment figure and the affair partner; the person is trying to master incomplete business from childhood. As a result, some people will choose an affair partner who is difficult, temperamental, or unpredictable. Under those circumstances, the unfaithful partner is often caught in a triangle.

Q:  What do you mean?
Dr. G.  The person maintains the marriage, and can't leave it, and maintains the affair, and can't leave that either. Tension arises when either the affair partner or spouse applies pressure on them to get off the fence. The spouse gives them security and a sense of family. The affair partner provides excitement and passion. When the involved spouse says "I don't know which person to be with," what they really want is to keep both.

Q:  The challenge becomes, how, with busy lives, do people satisfy all of their needs within the marriage?.
Dr. G.  It is a false belief that if I'm incomplete, I have to be completed by another person. You have to do it through your own life, your own work, for your own pleasure, through individual growth. The more fulfilled you are, in terms of things that you do separately that please you, the more individuated and more whole you are-and the more intimate you can be. Then you're not expecting the other person to make you happy. You're expecting the other person to share happiness with you, to join you in your happiness.

Q:  Are more couples trying to survive affairs these days?
Dr. G.  People are more willing to work through them. There is not the same kind of bitter resolution that people may have had in the past, when women would stay with an unfaithful husband because they had no place else to go. Staying together was more out of weakness; the marriage didn't improve. Now people are saying, I'm willing to work this through, but we have to solve whatever problems we have, we have to get something out of this; our marriage has to be even better than it was before.

Q:  Are men and women equally part of this willingness?
Dr. G.  More men are calling to come in for therapy. That's a very positive sign. The downside is, it's often too late. By the time men  are alarmed, the woman is too distanced from the marriage.

Q: What other changes do you see in affairs these days?
Dr. G. Cyber affairs are new. For some people the computer itself is very addictive. They get very caught up in it. It's hiding out, escaping. And an affair is an escape-from the realities of everyday life. These two escapes are now paired.

The other danger online is that people can disguise who they are. Think of the roles you can take on if you hide behind a computer screen. More so than in workplace affairs, you can project anything onto the other person.

At the computer, with a screen in front of you; you can act out any fantasy you want. You can make this other person become anybody you want them to be. There's a loosening up, because you're not face to face with the person; the relationship begins in anonymity. Sometimes people send nude pictures back and forth.

Q:  This attracts only a certain kind of person, doesn't it?
Dr. G. We don't know yet. Among the e-mail questions that I get are always a number from people who are concerned because their partner is having an online relationship with somebody. Or their partner had an affair with somebody they met online. It's very prevalent, and it's very dangerous.

If you're talking to somebody on the computer, and you begin to talk about your sexual fantasies, and you're not talking to your partner about your sexual fantasies, which relationship now has more sexual chemistry? Which relationship has more emotional intimacy? Then your partner walks in the room and you switch screens. Now you've got a wall of secrecy. It has all the components of an affair. And it's very easy.

Technology has impacted affairs in another way, too. Many people have discovered their partner's affair by getting the cellular phone bill, or by getting in the car and pushing redial on the car phone, or by taking their partner's beeper and seeing who's been calling. We're leaving a whole new electronic trail.

Q: Has that changed the dynamics or the psychology of affairs in any way?
Dr. G.  In the past, when someone was suspicious they could ask their partner: "Are you involved with somebody else?"  Or "what's going on?  You seem distant lately." If the partner denied there was anything wrong, there wasn't a whole lot somebody could do. Now there's tangible evidence people can utilize to find out if their hunches are indeed true.

Q:  There is a public conception of affairs as very glamorous, but as I'm hearing you tell it, the aftermath of affairs is pretty messy. How do we square these views?
Dr. G. They're both true. In those captured moments, there is passion and romance. We're in Stage One of relationship formation-idealizing the partner. Stage One can go on for years, as long as there's a forbidden aspect. The admiration and positive mirroring can go on for a long time-until you get to a reality-based relationship. Which is why so many affairs end after the person leaves the marriage.

Q: How many affairs survive as enduring relationships?
Dr. G. Only 10 percent of people who leave their relationship for affairs end up with the affair partner. Once you can be with the person every day, and deal with all the little irritations in a relationship that make it less romantic, you're into Stage Two-disillusionment.

Several people have told me they wish the affair had never happened; they wish they had worked on their marriage instead. Once they got into an affair, it was too compelling. But now that the affair has settled into a reality based relationship, it is too late to go back to the marriage; they destroyed too much.

Q:  How do most affairs get exposed or uncovered?
Dr. G. Sometimes the betrayed partner will just ask, "are you involved with somebody else?" Sometimes the affair partner, when it's a women, does something to inform the wife-she sends a letter or a copy of an explicit greeting card, or calls, or even shows up on the doorstep. She asks, "do you know  where your husband's been?"  Her motivation is not to be helpful but to break up the marriage. But often she's the one that then gets left out.

Sometimes people find out in horrible ways. They read about it in the newspaper or they get a sexually transmitted disease. Or the cell phone bill arrives. Or their  partner gets arrested-if there is a sexual addiction, the partner may be caught with prostitutes. Sometimes somebody is suspicious and checks it out, by going to the hotel room to see whether their partner's alone or by hiring detectives.

Q:  Things must be at a pretty pass to bring in private detectives.
Dr. G.  A newspaper article reported that when detectives were sent out to investigate an affair, the suspicions were founded in 95 percent of cases. When somebody gets to the point of hiring a detective, they're usually right. Obviously if you have to hire a detective, rebuilding trust is going to be much more difficult than when you ask and a partner admits to an affair.

Q:  Can all relationships be fixed after an affair?
Dr. G.  No. What I look for is how the unfaithful partner shows empathy for the pain that they have caused when the betrayed spouse starts acting crazy.

Q: In what way do they act crazy?
Dr. G.  They're very emotional. They cry easily, their emotions flip-flop. They are hypervigilant. They want to look at the beeper. They have flashbacks. In the car they hear a country-western song and start crying, or accusing. They obsess over the details of the affair. Although these are common posttraumatic reactions to infidelity, their behavior is very erratic and upsetting to them and their partner. How much compassion the partner has for that is one of the benchmarks.

Another sign of salvageability lies in how much responsibility the unfaithful partner is willing to take for the choice they made, regardless of problems that pre-existed in the marriage. (We definitely need to work on the weaknesses of the marriage, but not to justify the affair.) If the unfaithful partner says, "you made me do it," that's not as predictive of a good outcome as when the partner says, "we should have gone to counseling before this happened to deal with the problems." Sometimes the unfaithful partner really doesn't regret the affair, because it was very exciting.

One of the big strains between the partners in the primary relationship is the way they perceive the affair partner.

Q:  How so?
Dr. G. A lot of the anger and the rage the betrayed spouse feels is directed toward the affair partner rather than the marital partner: "that person doesn't have any morals;" "that person was exploitative." "That person's a home wrecker." To believe that of the marital partner would make it difficult to stay in the relationship.

At the same time, the person who had the affair may still be idealizing the affair partner. The unfaithful spouse perceives the affair partner as an angel, whereas the betrayed person perceives an evil person.

It's important at some point in the healing process for the involved person to see some flaws in the affair partner, so that they can partly see what their partner, the betrayed spouse, is telling them. But it's also important for the betrayed spouse to see the affair partner not as a cardboard character but as a human being who did some caring things.

Q: Is there anything else that helps you gauge the salvageability of a relationship after an affair?
Dr. G.  Empathy, responsibility-and the degree of understanding of the vulnerabilities that made an affair possible.

Q:  What vulnerabilities?
Dr. G.  There are individual vulnerabilities, such as curiosity. Somebody gets invited for lunch, and they go to the house because they're curious. They must learn that getting curious is a danger sign. Or they learn that if some damsel or guy in distress comes with a sad story, instead of becoming their confessor and their confidante, they give out the name of a great therapist. Knowing what these vulnerabilities are, and understanding them, allows a person to avoid them.

Q:  Are there relationship vulnerabilities?
Dr. G. The biggest one I see these days is the child-centered marriage. I tell couples that if you really love your kids, the best gift you can give them is your own happy marriage. You can't have a happy marriage if you never spend time alone. Your children need to see you going out together without them, or closing the bedroom door. That gives them a sense of security greater than they get by just by being loved.

Today's parents feel guilty because they don't have enough time with their kids. They think they're making it up to them by spending with them whatever leisure time they do have. They have family activities and family vacations. To help them rebuild the marriage I help them become more couple-centered, by building a cocoon around themselves as a couple.

Q:  There has to be a separate layer of adult relationship?
Dr. G. The affair represents a man and a woman getting together in a dyad and just devoting themselves to each other. Very busy couples sometimes have to actually look at their calendars and find when they can spend time together. Sometimes it's just a matter of better time management and better parental control. If a couple can unite to put the children to bed at eight o'clock, then they can have time together after that.

Q:  Are there other vulnerabilities?
Dr. G.  One is: getting too intimate with people you work with. One way to guard against danger is, if there's somebody you really like at work, then include them as part of a couple. Invite that person and their partner to come over, so that there isn't a separate relationship with that person. That's not a guarantee; people do have affairs with their best friend's spouse. But walling that relationship off and making it separate from the primary relationship is dangerous.

Q: Can you tell whether someone is secretly continuing the affair?
Dr. G. Sometimes progress just feels frozen. I make suggestions to be more caring, to build the marriage, and nothing happens. It could be either person's part. Perhaps the betrayed spouse is punishing the partner, or wants the partner to know how badly they are hurting, or having already given a lot in the relationship, is waiting to be given back to. Meanwhile the unfaithful spouse may not know what his or her own feelings are and avoids making a move toward the spouse for fear it will be misinterpreted as commitment. I try to find ways to foster caring, by giving them permission to act on momentary feelings of warmth for each other.

A sign that the affair is continuing is when the unfaithful partner isn't doing anything caring, and week after week makes excuses-"I don't feel it yet," or, "it would be false if I did it now." Sometimes it feels disloyal to the affair partner to be too caring or to have sex in the marriage.

Q:  Is it hard to get over an affair without a therapist?
Dr. G.  It's hard to do with a therapist. People can get over it, but I don't know that they resolve the issues. Usually the unfaithful person wants to let it rest at "Hi hon, I'm back. Let's get on with our lives. Why do we have to keep going back over the past?" The betrayed person wants to know the story with all the gory details. They may begin to feel they're wrong to keep asking, and so may suppress their need to know because their partner doesn't want to talk about it. They may stay together, but they really don't learn anything and they don't heal.

Q. Can it ever be the same as it was before the affair?
Dr.G.  The affair creates a loss of innocence and some scar tissue. I tell couples things will never be the same. But the relationship may be stronger than it was before. If you break something and glue it back together with Super-Glue, it could be stronger than before-although you can see the cracks when you look closely.

Q: How do you rebuild trust?
Dr. G.  Through honesty. First I have to build safety. It comes about by stopping all contact with the affair partner and sharing your whereabouts, by being willing to answer the questions from your partner, by handing over the beeper, even by creating a fund to hire a detective from time to time to check up at random.

It also requires sharing information about any encounters with the affair partner before being asked; when you come home, you say, I saw him today, and he asked me how  we're doing, and I said I really don't want to discuss that with you.

That's counterintuitive. People think that talking about it with the spouse will create upset, and they'll have to go through the whole thing again. But it doesn't. Instead of trying to put the affair in a vault and lock it up, if they're willing to take it out and look at it, then the trust is rebuilt through that intimacy. The betrayed spouse may say, "I remember when such-and-such happened." If the unfaithful spouse can say, "yeah, I just recalled such-and-such," and they bring up things, or ask their partner, "how are you feeling?  I see you're looking down today, is that because you're remembering?," trust can be rebuilt.

Q:  Eventually the questioning and revealing assume a more normal level in the relationship?
Dr. G.  Yes, but things will